Quality Leaders

    Berkshire’s $9.6 Billion Buyback Offers Less Reassurance at $571

    Berkshire repurchased shares as operating earnings fell. Its latest price is nearly 13% above September’s average purchase price, making valuation a separate question.

    QMoat Editorial Team

    Berkshire’s $9.6 Billion Buyback Offers Less Reassurance at $571

    Berkshire Hathaway repurchased approximately $9.646 billion of its shares in the third quarter even as operating earnings fell 5.8%, according to results released November 7. The purchases offer evidence that management saw value. They leave investors with a harder question: how much of that value remains at Friday’s $570.89 pre-release closing price for Class B shares?

    The distinction matters because Berkshire paid an average $506.64 per B share in September. The November 6 close was 12.7% higher. With the stock now trading at approximately 1.60 times September book value, following the company’s capital allocation requires more than copying its last disclosed trade.

    The buyback expresses a judgment at a particular price

    Berkshire’s quarterly report permits repurchases when the chief executive, after consulting the chairman, believes the price is below conservatively determined intrinsic value. The authorization has no maximum amount or expiration date, and it imposes no obligation to buy. Repurchases must leave consolidated cash, cash equivalents and Treasury bills at least $30 billion.

    That framework makes the spending informative. Management was exercising discretion rather than fulfilling a fixed commitment to distribute capital. Buying below intrinsic value should increase the remaining shareholders’ proportional claim on value, even when the latest quarter’s earnings are weaker.

    The limitation is equally important: intrinsic value is an estimate, and Berkshire does not disclose the calculation or the discount it believes it obtained. Its monthly average B-share purchase prices were $496.24 in July, $503.99 in August and $506.64 in September. None establishes a valuation threshold at the substantially higher November price.

    Nor does buying above book value contradict the policy. A collection of operating businesses can be worth more than its accounting equity. Repurchases can therefore make economic sense above book, provided the price remains below the value of future cash flows. The policy supplies a decision rule; investors still have to assess its application.

    Railroad growth partly offsets weaker insurance earnings

    The earnings release reported quarterly operating earnings of $12.705 billion, down from $13.485 billion. Nine-month operating earnings nevertheless increased 8.0% to $37.034 billion. The longer comparison argues against treating one weaker quarter as evidence that the entire collection of businesses has deteriorated.

    Operating earnings are Berkshire’s non-GAAP measure, excluding investment gains and specified impairments. GAAP net earnings fell to $22.112 billion from $30.796 billion, but investment gains also declined to $9.407 billion from $17.311 billion. Berkshire cautions that quarterly investment gains can make reported net earnings misleading as an indicator of business performance.

    The operating weakness was substantial in insurance. Pretax underwriting profit fell to $1.683 billion from $3.163 billion; GEICO’s contribution declined to $982 million from $1.773 billion. These figures are pretax and should not be directly compared with the group’s after-tax operating earnings. They nonetheless show that a valuable insurance franchise can experience pronounced profit variability.

    BNSF provided a counterweight. Railroad net earnings rose 19.3% to $1.729 billion, while operating revenue reached $6.870 billion from $5.988 billion. Freight volumes increased 3.9%, and average revenue per unit rose 10.5%. The latter reflected higher fuel surcharges as well as yield, so it should not all be interpreted as underlying pricing power.

    The mix supports Berkshire’s diversification argument while qualifying it. Different businesses can offset one another, reducing dependence on a single source of profit. That is valuable resilience, but it does not ensure steady quarterly growth or eliminate the need to examine insurance and industrial returns separately.

    Financial flexibility has value at a price

    Berkshire’s insurance and other businesses held $352.3 billion of cash, cash equivalents and Treasury bills at September 30, net of unsettled Treasury-purchase payables. Such liquidity creates room to absorb shocks and pursue opportunities without relying on favorable financing markets. That flexibility is a genuine part of the quality case.

    It is not all spare money belonging to shareholders. Berkshire also carries insurance obligations, debt and operating commitments. The value of liquidity lies partly in the protection it provides and partly in what management eventually earns by deploying it. A large balance alone does not establish an investment return.

    Using $761.368 billion of Berkshire shareholders’ equity and 2.12835 billion equivalent B shares outstanding at quarter-end gives book value of approximately $357.73 per share. The November 6 close therefore implies about 1.596 times book and an equity value of $1.215 trillion. These are calculations using September balances, not estimates of intrinsic value.

    Annualizing third-quarter operating earnings and dividing by the quarter’s average equivalent B shares produces roughly $23.75 a share. The stock price is approximately 24 times that figure. This is only a single-quarter earnings snapshot multiplied by four, not a normalized earnings forecast or conventional forward P/E. Insurance variability alone limits its precision.

    Berkshire’s repurchases strengthen the case for disciplined capital allocation. They do not resolve the valuation at a higher subsequent price. The investment case rests on durable operating returns and productive use of exceptional liquidity; the buyback is supporting evidence. Investors paying today’s premium need those economics to justify it independently.

    Sources